97 View
1 CommentIn discussionComments enabled
In the category:
DEUSG
Hi All,
As a follow up to our DEUSG meeting last week please use this discussion thread for any feedback on additional attributes being added to the MRCM for use in national drug extensions.
Shane Byrnes, if it would be helpful, I’m happy to share the full set of AMT MRCM extensions here. This includes:
Changes to the domain and range for existing international attributes
Additional attributes defined by AMT, along with their intended purpose and usage – for example, Linda discussed 30465011000036106 | Has container type | at the Oslo meeting
It would also be valuable to gather MRCM extensions from other drug extensions wherever they exist.
We could build a shopping list of attributes for other NRCs to consider. If others have similar needs, optional attributes and MRCM extensions could be added to the international edition to make them easy to use - some already exist like "Has supplier".
This would be better than NRCs having to develop their own attributes and MRCM extensions or "side promote" – which can be both time-consuming and complex.
Before I go ahead, could I please get permission to upload files (e.g. images) to this page? I’d like to include visual examples alongside the text, which will make the explanation more concise and accessible.
1 Comment
Dion McMurtrie
Shane Byrnes, if it would be helpful, I’m happy to share the full set of AMT MRCM extensions here. This includes:
Changes to the domain and range for existing international attributes
Additional attributes defined by AMT, along with their intended purpose and usage – for example, Linda discussed 30465011000036106 | Has container type | at the Oslo meeting
It would also be valuable to gather MRCM extensions from other drug extensions wherever they exist.
We could build a shopping list of attributes for other NRCs to consider. If others have similar needs, optional attributes and MRCM extensions could be added to the international edition to make them easy to use - some already exist like "Has supplier".
This would be better than NRCs having to develop their own attributes and MRCM extensions or "side promote" – which can be both time-consuming and complex.
Before I go ahead, could I please get permission to upload files (e.g. images) to this page? I’d like to include visual examples alongside the text, which will make the explanation more concise and accessible.