20:00 UTC on Tuesday 13 March 2018 - 90 minutes.
- Bindings to FHIR Clinical Resources (e.g. value set bindings)
Rob Hausam, Peter G. Williams, Linda Bird, Andrew Perry, Anne Randorff Højen, David Sperzel, Jim Case, Michael Hosking, Peter Jordan, Yongsheng Gao, Michael Lawley, Susan Matney, Charles E McDonald Jr. (cemcdonald)
|Owner||Notes & Actions|
|1||Welcome and introductions||5|
Recording + Notes.
Summary of previous week
Summary of previous week:
|3||Profile for Specimen Resouce||65|
Suggestion from Jim Case that the type attribute would be better bound to (< Substance plus < Morphologic Abnormality plus < Physical Object (or selection thereof)) rather than Specimen as it avoids any potential conflict with the other attributes and is effectively opening up post coordination, rather than sticking to a inherently restricted set of pre-coordinated concepts.
Similarly (Linda Bird), the method attribute is currently a selection of SNOMED CT concepts plus a V2 valueset.
Two main options:
Jim Case also suggested that using these decomposed fields would only be used outside of a SNOMED context. Otherwise could be achieved - (PWI: more safely due to MRCM) - with post coordinated.
How do we produce and publish ValueSets?
|5||Molecular Pathology harmonising V2 and FHIR Datasets.|
|6||Next TB meeting||5|
27 March 2018
|No content found.|