Date/Time 

20:00 UTC on Tuesday 13 March 2018 - 90 minutes.

Objectives

  • Bindings to FHIR Clinical Resources (e.g. value set bindings)

Meeting Details

Onlinehttps://snomed.zoom.us/my/snomedhl7

Phone: See https://zoom.us/zoomconference for available phone numbers (meeting id 242-348-6949)

Chathttps://chat.snomedtools.org/channel/snomed-fhir
          (instructions and guide here - Getting Started with Rocket Chat)


Discussion items

ItemDescription

Mins

OwnerNotes & Actions
1Welcome and introductions5

Recording + Notes.

2

Summary of previous week


5
3Profile for Specimen Resouce65

Specimen binding

Suggestion from Jim Case that the type attribute would be better bound to (< Substance plus < Morphologic Abnormality plus < Physical Object (or selection thereof)) rather than Specimen as it avoids any potential conflict with the other attributes and is effectively opening up post coordination, rather than sticking to a inherently restricted set of pre-coordinated concepts.

Similarly (Linda Bird), the method attribute is currently a selection of SNOMED CT concepts plus a V2 valueset.

Two main options:

  1. Use Specimen hierarchy for "type" and then constrain what can appear in the other fields (and how we deal with conflict!)
  2. Put all information into a post coordinated expression in the "type" attribute (Jim Case noted that some aspects - like the shipping container - may not be characteristics intrinsic to the specimen).

Jim Case also suggested that using these decomposed fields would only be used outside of a SNOMED context. Otherwise could be achieved - (PWI: more safely due to MRCM) - with post coordinated.

4ValueSets10

How do we produce and publish ValueSets?

  • Tools?
5Molecular Pathology harmonising V2 and FHIR Datasets.

Molecular Pathology harmonising V2 and FHIR Datasets

6Next TB meeting5



27 March 2018


 

Meeting Files


 

Previous Meetings