Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Tuesday 12th February 2019 2000UTC

Meeting Details:  https://snomed.zoom.us/j/231295710

Information on using Zoom: Starting with ZOOM

Attendees

Cathy Richardson - attended

Apologies

Minutes:

  • Page will be updated with summary notes from meeting.
  • Please see recording for full details.


Objectives

Discussion items (In draft)

ItemDescriptionOwnerNotesAction
1WelcomeCathy Richardson
  • Attendees list


2Apologies/conflicts of interest
  • Apologies as noted
  • Declarations of interest -nil new declarations advised.

3Administrative
  • Minutes of meetings

4Action ListCathy Richardson
5Member Forum update
  • Report- see comments below.


6Quality InitiativeLesley MacNeil

7Review of Administrative Content
  • Discussed.
  • Several responses provided.
  • Extension on first round of review made any other's who wish to provide feedback
    • Due date Monday 18th February.
  • 2019 Administrative Content work

8NMO and “Other” ethnic non-mixed conceptsMonica Harry
  • Please see attached briefing note and recording for more information
    • Group advised of planned. Topic discussed.
      • Some countries do not use ethnic concepts for historical reasons.

9SNOMED content derived from ICD 9 and READ codes
  • SNOMED content derived from ICD 9 and READ codes
    • Presentation provided (see link above to access) and discussed by group.
    • Netherlands identifying a number of issues e.g. duplicates, questions on meaning but given numbers and SLA cap unable to submit given higher priority requests.
    • Netherlands looking to contact NRC's re the READ code and ICD9 concepts where meaning is unclear.
      • Sheree Hemingway offered to be a point of contact re READ codes.
      • Olivier Bodenreider - will provide a point of contact for the ICD9 concepts.
        • With ICD-9: looking at ICD-10 and ICD-11 is also a way to manage this.
    • Group discussed larger issue of reporting issues with content e.g. duplicates, errors. Reporting option desired by group members with recognition that these issues may need to sit on hold given other priorities such as the Quality Initiative work. With reporting, it would be preferred if there was an option to see if the issue had already been reported.

10April meetingGroup

11Any other businessALL


Meeting Files

Attachments



Previous Meetings

Content Report Table
maxResults12
showCommentsCounttrue
spaces@self
labelsmeeting-agenda