1 CommentIn discussionComments disabled
In the category:
Currently ECL expressions can match (return) concepts that are either the source or the target of a relationship triple (target is accessed via the 'reverse' notation or 'dot notation', but not the relationship type (ie attribute name) itself.
For example, I can write:
<< 404684003|Clinical finding| : 363698007|Finding site| = <<66019005|Limb structure|
Michael - Is there a strong use case for this? And if so, do you have a proposal as to how this should be done?