- Created by Harold Solbrig, last modified on 2016-Aug-17
- Unselect all elements
- New
- In discussion
- Resolved
- No corresponding status
Choose creation period
ideation.btn.close- Unselect all elements
- No corresponding category
What is your opinion about retrieving only primitive/fully defined concepts in ECL?
Thoughts on the topic
Some doubts in non-redundant attributes in cardinality count
Provisional releases contain content that should be treated as somehow separate and distinct from normal production releases. However, to ingest, manipulate, and process with standard toolchains (e.g., terminology servers), it still needs to be identified while still remaining distinct from production content. This proposal is that a parallel URI space (http://snomed.info/xsct) be set aside for such provisional releases. Mirroring the http://snomed.info/sct URI space, this would include:
Tried four implementations of ECL using grouped and non-grouped attributes in the query and got different results.
MRCM-related questions
Currently ECL expressions can match (return) concepts that are either the source or the target of a relationship triple (target is accessed via the 'reverse' notation or 'dot notation', but not the relationship type (ie attribute name) itself. For example, I can write: << 404684003|Clinical finding| : 363698007|Finding site| = <<66019005|Limb structure| << 404684003|Clinical finding| . 363698007|Finding site| But I can't get all the attribute names that are used by << 404684003|Clini
I propose that the compositional grammar support comments in the same way as the ECL. Not just for completeness and symmetry with the other languages: I actually tried to comment out a portion of an expression before quickly realizing it made the expression illegal!
What should be the interpretation of cardinality of reverse attribute? Does the cardinality apply to the source or the destination of the relationship? Just to clarify!
Discussion about extending the ECL to support sub-expressions
Topic | Status | Author | Like | View | Replies | Creation date | Last Reply | Contributors | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Discussion | Retrieving Primitive/Fully defined concepts | In discussion | 0 | View 571 | Comment 2 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime() Nov 14, 2019 15:18 | 1911150327 Nov 15, 2019 03:27 | 2 | Undefined | |
Discussion | Executing maps - ECL or QL | In discussion | 0 | View 764 | Comment 2 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime() Nov 13, 2019 11:14 | 1911150412 Nov 15, 2019 04:12 | 2 | Undefined | |
Question | Non-redundant attributes in cardinality count | Resolved | 0 | View 1204 | Comment 6 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime() Nov 12, 2019 13:10 | 2007080352 Jul 8, 2020 03:52 | 6 | Undefined | |
Discussion | URIs for provisional releases | In discussion | 1 | View 804 | Comment 1 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime() Feb 2, 2019 11:42 | 1902120351 Feb 12, 2019 03:51 | 1 | Undefined | |
Discussion | ECL and grouped attributes | In discussion | 0 | View 4370 | Comment 20 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime() Jan 2, 2019 12:39 | 1902121119 Feb 12, 2019 11:19 | 20 | Undefined | |
Discussion | MRCM | In discussion | 0 | View 3039 | Comment 15 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime() Dec 17, 2018 11:09 | 2302061400 Feb 6, 2023 14:00 | 15 | Undefined | |
Question | How can I write an ECL expression to match attribute names | In discussion | 0 | View 1083 | Comment 1 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime() Jan 8, 2018 04:25 | 1902102304 Feb 10, 2019 23:04 | 1 | Undefined | |
Discussion | Comments in expressions | In discussion | 0 | View 2582 | Comment 12 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime() Aug 27, 2017 14:26 | 1708301314 Aug 30, 2017 13:14 | 12 | Undefined | |
Discussion | Interpretation of cardinality of reverse attributes | In discussion | 0 | View 2216 | Comment 8 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime() May 15, 2017 07:52 | 1705170555 May 17, 2017 05:55 | 8 | Undefined | |
Discussion | Nesting / Sub-expressions in the ECL | In discussion | 0 | View 3170 | Comment 11 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime() Sep 30, 2016 00:30 | 1702070339 Feb 7, 2017 03:39 | 11 | Undefined |
Discussion summary
Contributors (12)
-
Number of accepted comment 0Number of comment 1
-
Number of accepted comment 0Number of comment 1
-
Number of accepted comment 0Number of comment 17
-
Number of accepted comment 0Number of comment 10
-
Number of accepted comment 0Number of comment 5
-
Number of accepted comment 0Number of comment 1
-
Number of accepted comment 0Number of comment 4
-
Number of accepted comment 1Number of comment 31
-
Number of accepted comment 1Number of comment 16
-
Number of accepted comment 0Number of comment 4
-
Number of accepted comment 0Number of comment 1
-
Number of accepted comment 0Number of comment 4
- No labels
Linda Bird