Under care of <professional> (finding) content is being considered for inactivation (with return the relevant extension where applicable) as it is seen as realm specific content. The meaning of the term used to represent the clinician or service may vary between countries. Prior to undertaking this step the CMAG is being asked if this demotion of content would cause an issue for members.
Please see the subtypes under the following concepts:
Under care of team (finding)
Under care of person (finding)
Under care of service (finding)
Actions:
Date
Requested action
Requester(s)
Response required by:
Comments
Requested 11th April 2018.
Please advise if the demotion of this content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
Camilla Wiberg DanielsenPlease advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
Daniel KarlssonPlease advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
Elaine WoolerPlease advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
Elze de GrootPlease advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
John FountainPlease advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
Linda ParisienPlease advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
Matt CordellPlease advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
Olivier BodenreiderPlease advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
Jostein VenPlease advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
Johannes GnaegiPlease advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
Theresa BarryPlease advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments.
Has nothing in the extension in this group. Also, no content in our maintained and under-development refests.
Denmark
2018-04-25
Not in use in Denmark.
UK
2018-04-26
Is there any further information on the decision around this please. I've looked at the tracker which states "Ed Panel decision: Pattern not accepted, considered to be realm specific especially with respect to social care." We have extension content in this space and there is a significant amount of core content that is not realm specific e.g. 305439002 | Under care of counselor (finding), 305485004 | Under care of geneticist (finding), 305613006 | Under care of physiotherapist (finding). Is this content also to be retired or just the realm specific?