Page History

Conflicts of interest

Notice of recording

No conflicts raised

Recording advice given.

List of clinicians

• Update
• Link to Clinical Community Training and Resources

• Fortnightly meetings
• 2 weeks for each round of review. Discussion on that review held 2 weeks after that. Allows time for collation of results.
• Group to start the next review whilst results of previous review being collated.
• Spreadsheet:
  • Development of instructions and an explanation content for reviewers
    • Include description conventions for awareness e.g. FSN. Also noting countries can add localised terms.
  • Potential for additional columns for local and consumer terms (use at a national only level) -only for use where desired at a national level. Management of this information needs to be considered as not used by SNOMED International.
  • Keep number of concepts for review at a reasonable level. Split areas into subsections if required.
• Training for clinicians on SNOMED CT? Updated needed please - see above
• Questions from clinicians during the review- approach to be used? Email or post on discussion section of site. Paul to advise on preference.
• If required Paul and/or Cathy can do a call with clinicians (outside of the reviews) where they have questions relevant to the work/SNOMED.

• Document to support review on eye disorders in diabetes: http://www.icoph.org/downloads/ICOGuidelinesforDiabeticEyeCare.pdf
  https://www.idf.org/e-library/guidelines.html
  • one example of guidelines for Diabetic Macular Edema by the International Diabetes Federation
    https://www.idf.org/e-library/guidelines/161-dme-clinical-practice-recommendations.html