Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata


Summary

CMAG review of the 2017 Self evaluation 

Actions

DateRequested actionRequester(s)Response required by:Comments
 15 November 2017 Review of the 2017 CMAG self evaluation document
  • Camilla Wiberg Danielsen  Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required.
  • Daniel Karlsson  Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required.
  • Elaine Wooler  Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required.
  • Elze de Groot   Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required.
  • John Fountain   Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required.
  • Linda Parisien   Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required.
  • Matt Cordell  Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required.
  • Olivier Bodenreider  Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required.
  • Jostein Ven  Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required.
  • Johannes Gnaegi  Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required.
Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments.


Relevant documents

2017-11-14 - CMAG Meeting

Country response 

CountryDateResponse
 U.S. 15OCT2017

 Esstially OK. Here are a few suggestions.

  • To substantiate out contribution, would recommend to list (at least some of) the projects and topics on which CMAG has provided national perspective.
  • Would also mention the venues to which the extension analysis has been reported (business meetings in April 2017, poster at the Expo in October 2017).
  • Finally, would point out that several new menmbers have joined in 2017, providing a broader perspective from member countries, while remaining agile and engaged.
 NZ 5Dec17 OK by me
 CA8Dec2017 It looks good
 UK 8DEC17 Looks good though agree with Olivier's suggestions for some additional information.
 SE 8DEC17Agreeing in principle with Olivier, but I'm not sure of the function of this document. If it's a box-ticking exercise, everything in the table is true and we've done some good work, and it is fine as is. If it's to be distributed more widely then more details, through links etc., could be provided.
   
   
   
Member countries without a CMAG rep  

 

CMAG response

DateCMAG ResponseNext steps
   
   
   

 

Final outcome: 

Date: 

 

  • No labels