Descriptions:
Term | description type | Language/acceptability | Language/acceptability | Case significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
[Periods of life] [Fracture morphology] of [bone structure] (disorder) | FSN | us:P | gb:P | ci |
[Periods of life] [Fracture morphology] of [bone structure] | SYN | us:P | gb:P | ci |
Concept model:
Attribute Group Cardinality | Attribute Cardinality | Attribute in Group Cardinality | Attribute | Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
0..0 | 1..1 | |||
0..1 | 0..1 | |||
1..* | 1..1 | [Fracture morphology] << 72704001 |Fracture (morphologic abnormality)| | ||
1..1 | [bone structure] << 272673000 |Bone structure (body structure)| | |||
0..1 | [Periods of life] < 282032007 |Periods of life (qualifier value)| |
Definition status:
900000000000073002 |Defined (core metadata concept)|
Applies To:
<< 125605004 |Fracture of bone (disorder)|
Template language:
[[~0..1]] { [[~0..1]] 42752001 |Due to (attribute)| = [[ +id (<< 773760007 |Traumatic event (event)| )]]},
[[~1..* @roleGroup]] {
[[~1..1]] 116676008 |Associated morphology (attribute)| = [[ +id (<< 72704001 |Fracture (morphologic abnormality)| ) @fractureMorphology ]],
[[~1..1]] 363698007 |Finding site (attribute)| = [[ +id (<< 272673000 |Bone structure (body structure)| ) @boneStructure ]],
[[~0..1]] 246454002 |Occurrence (attribute)| = [[ +id (< 282032007 |Periods of life (qualifier value)| ) @periodOfLife ]]}
Rules for description generation:
- Apply General rules for generating descriptions for templates;
- Apply Enhancements for the Template Language;
JIRA ticket:
- QI-54Getting issue details... STATUS
- INFRA-8163Getting issue details... STATUS
6 Comments
Yongsheng Gao
Hi Jim Case, I have added the template language and updated the cardinality format of the model section. If no further changes are needed, I will raise a ticket for implementation.
Cheers,
Yong
Jim Case
Yongsheng Gao, the EAG recommended and we have implemented the notion that we do not use a DUE TO traumatic event relationship with fractures. I.e., we do not assume a fracture is traumatic unless the FSN specifies it. We now have a concept 1003502008 |Traumatic fracture of bone (disorder)| for those concepts where it is obvious that trauma is necessary.
Yongsheng Gao
Hi Jim Case, should we change the domain to this new traumatic fracture concept and change the template title? The alternative option is that all traumatic conditions would follow the generic template for traumatic injury. However, it would not have a constraint on |finding site| of bone structure. What is your preference?
Cheers,
Yong
Jim Case
One possibility is to make the DUE TO optional and then the template would work for traumatic or pathologic fractures as well as those agnostic to trauma or disease
Yongsheng Gao
Hi Jim Case, I have updated the cardinality for the |Due to| attribute.
Jim Case
This will work. Approved to move on