Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

ActivityScopeDeliverablesTimeframe (suggested)Lead
Provision of national perspectives on current SNOMED CT content projects and topicsRelevant current SNOMED CT content projects and topics as identified by the IHTSDO Content team
  1. Items will be raised as relevant over the course of the year. For each item raised the deliverable will be input and/or feedback as required within mutually agreed timeframes.
Provision of input on the topic/s within set timeframes as agreed by the CMAG and Content Team. Cathy Richardson
Prioritisation of the IHTSDO Content Tracker

Prioritisation of the IHTSDO Content Tracker issues at the component level.

Components explained: What do the fields in the Content Tracker mean?

  1. Identification of the components are a 'high' priority for resolution by members.
    1. Medium to low priorities are not required.
    2. Within those of high priority- the key areas of focus should be identifiedIf more than five are identified then within this group prioritisation should also be included.
  2. Prioritisation of the IHTSDO Content Tracker components using the Priorisation criteria and taking into account the Member input provided.
    1. At a minimum the top 20 components should be identified.
  1. Due by XXXX
  2. Due The top twenty are due by 28th February 2017

1. XXXX with support from Cathy Richardson

2. Cathy Richardson

Development of collaboration on content development between Members

National extensions

  1. A Confluence page where Members provide information on their current content development.
    • Includes population of the page and agreement on the frequency of updates
  2. An agreement (developed in collaboration with the IHTSDO) for the regular updating of the MultiEnglish browser
  3. Analysis of the extension content with
    1. identification of areas where
      1. two or more countries have developed content
      2. content has been developed by one country that is of value to another country
    2. identification of duplication of content e.g. equivalence.
    3. A proposal on how to manage content identified in points a and b.

Item 3 is dependent on tooling and the work occurring in the Modelling Advisory Group.

  1. Due by XXXX
  2. Due by 30 June 2017
  3. Due by 30 September 2017
    1. Due by XXXX
    2. Due by XXXX
    3. ? Due by 30 September 2017
  1. XXXX
  2. XXXX
  3. XXXX

with support from Cathy Richardson

...