Content Managers Advisory Group

Page tree

Versions Compared

Old Version 6

changes.mady.by.user Cathy Richardson

Saved on

compared with

New Version 7

changes.mady.by.user Cathy Richardson

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Note: This is

...

a working draft for 2017 Work plan. 

Actions:

DateRequested ActionRequester(s)Action required by:Comments
     
  

 

  

...

ActivityScopeDeliverablesTimeframe (suggested)Lead
Provision of national perspectives on current SNOMED CT content projects and topicsRelevant current SNOMED CT content projects and topics as identified by the IHTSDO Content team
  1. Items will be raised as relevant over the course of the year. For each item raised for feedback this the deliverable will be provided input and/or feedback as required within mutually agreed timeframes.
Provision of input on the topic/s within set timeframes as agreed by the CMAG and Content Team. Cathy Richardson
Prioritisation of the IHTSDO Content Tracker

Prioritisation of the IHTSDO Content Tracker issues at the component level.

Components explained: What do the fields in the Content Tracker mean?

  1. Identification of which the components are a high priority for resolution by members.
    1. If more than five are identified then within this group prioritisation should also be included.
  2. Prioritisation of the IHTSDO Content Tracker components
  1. Due by XXXX
  2. Due by 28th February 2017

1. XXXX with support from Cathy Richardson

2. Cathy Richardson

Development of collaboration on content development between Members

National extensions

  1. A Confluence page where Members provide information on their current content development.
    • Includes population of the page and agreement on the frequency of updates
  2. An agreement (developed in collaboration with the IHTSDO) for the regular updating of the MultiEnglish browser
  3. Analysis of the extension content with
    1. identification of areas where
      1. two or more countries have developed content
      2. content has been developed by one country that is of value to another country
    2. identification of duplication of content e.g. equivalence.
    3. A proposal on how to manage content identified in points a and b.

Item 3 is dependent on tooling and the work occurring in the Modelling Advisory Group.

  1. Due by XXXX
  2. Due by 30 June 2017
  3. Due by 30 September 2017
    1. Due by XXXX
    2. Due by XXXX
    3. ? Due by 30 September 2017
  1. XXXX
  2. XXXX
  3. XXXX

with support from Cathy Richardson

...

The key criteria for success of the Content Managers AG in 2017 will be related to the timely provision of advice and feedback to support the Head of IHTSDO Content Development Roadmap and the IHTSDO Authoring Team.The key 2017 Content Work Plan. The measures of success in this area will be:

  • Initial work towards the development of criteria to support the prioritization of the issues on the IHTSDO Content Tracker. 
  • Evidence of the timely provision of advice and feedback on content topics and issues that are presented to the Group for the purposes of seeking input. 
  • Initial planning to support active group contribution to the development of a process that supports the implementation of Distributed Editing. 

 

will relate to the achievement of the deliverables as set out in the 2017 activities section above. 


 

Attachments
uploadtrue

 

 

Country response 

 

...