...
| Country | Date | Response | |
|---|---|---|---|
| US | 28FEB2020 | This concept is used in only one value set from the Value Set Authority Center. More over, the value set in which it is used is a broad "Problem" value set defined as
This constitutes at best weak evidence of use, because there is no evidence of use in a specific context (i.e., related either allergy or to parenteral nutrition). | |
| SE | 2020-03-02 (ISO 8601!) | Not in use in any reference set we are responsible for, or any other use that we know of. This concept looks like a grouper rather than anything that would be recorded in the medical record. Likely, if we were asked for advice on the use of this concept by our users we would give a negative recommendation, of course depending on the specifics on the use case. | |
| DK | 202-03-02 | Not in use in DK | |
| Australia | 2020-03-04 | We don't have any visibility of this specific concept being used. I would expect it to already be encompassed by the inactivation of allergy to "role groupers" concdepts, as described in Content Improvements in the Substance and Product Hierarchies - 2020-Feb-20 | |
| New Zealand | 2020-03-10 | This concept is not used in any reference set we manage and we have not seen it used elsewhere. | |
| Canada | 2020-03-11 | Not in use in Canada | |
| NO | 2020-03-12 | Not in use in Norway | |
| AR | 2020-03-14 | Not in use in Argentine edition | |
UK Member countries without a CMAG rep | 2020-03-17 | This concept has some usage, but very, very low level (e.g. 40 instances in the last year). |
CMAG response
| Date | CMAG Response | Next steps |
|---|---|---|
...