Meeting details: Tuesday 8th April at 15:30-17:30 CEST (13:30-15:30 UTC), Sonia Henie - Kunst room at the Radisson Blu Plaza Oslo, Norway
Hybrid meeting
Meeting Details: :https://snomed.zoom.us/j/95069855707?pwd=dndhRDlaWEZGOWtCa2tqSmczU291Zz09
Passcode:039823
Information on using Zoom: Starting with ZOOM
Recording
https://snomed.zoom.us/rec/share/IGo247_kXBc7gwv8qkwDnqK3LGEAPSOV8XVNhEVXlkSD8ZGIO9JZ70u-u_KHBLV4.GPgD2giCl6gXh_e1
Passcode: ?=2%T52.
Attendees
Monica Harry , Maria Braithwaite , Elze de Groot , Katrien Scheerlinck , Julie Boutin , Graeme Elsby , Nicola Ingram , Frank Geier , Ismat Mohd Sulaiman , Achyut Patil , Marcos Mireles , Marjolaine Gagnon , Elisabeth Serrot , Sofia Theorell , Hanne Johansen , Trine Angelskar , Camilla Wiberg Danielsen , Louise Bie , Matt Cordell , John Snyder , Lea Miharsa , Victor Medina , Ahjung Byun ,Marianne Pöllabauer, Garrett O'Mahony , Erica Culp , Theresa Barry (part of meeting)
Actions:
Date | Requested action | Requester(s) | Response required by: | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
| Review meeting minutes | Please review the April CMAG draft minutes and advise of any changes required by . Thank you. |
Previous Meetings
Title | Creator | Modified |
---|---|---|
No content found. |
7 Comments
Cathy Richardson
Following on from the discussion on the NCPT refset, there is only one refset. Interventions concepts were added for the release this year.The rest of NCPT will follow for April 2026 if resources allow. Please see: SNOMED CT Nutrition Care Process Terminology (NCPT) Refset package Release Notes - January 2025
Kind regards,
Cathy
Cathy Richardson
Endoscopy modelling question located: Modelling of percutaneous endoscopic procedures Graeme Elsby
Questions for the National Content Modelling forum can be asked as discussion questions: Discussions
Camilla Wiberg Danielsen
Hi Cathy,
I do not have permission to give my response about review of the minutes.
Cathy Richardson
Hi Camilla Wiberg Danielsen , Sorry about that. Have fixed the issue. Cathy
Matt Cordell
I think we really need to revisit the very last topic around Content trackers - and eventually escalate to Member Forum.
For me this felt like a revelation about the disconnect/misunderstanding about Quality Improvement.
If the QI project is primarily about apply templates, proximal primitive modelling etc (structurally tidying) - that might make things easier for future transforms etc. But I don't think members and users are seeing any tangible benefit from that.
The trackers represent real issues that have been encountered by members and other users - and a lot have been open for many years. Until these are resolved those users will continue to raise concerns about quality.
I think the appeal of the QI work is it's easier to measure/track/report. But, at I feel like it gives a false sense of improvement to those who aren't hands on with terminology issues.
Camilla Wiberg Danielsen
Thanks Matt Cordell for picking this up and hopefully continuing the discussion about the quality of SCT.
Cathy Richardson
Hi Matt Cordell and Camilla Wiberg Danielsen - we will be adding this topic to the next agenda.