Page tree

StatusReady for review
Version

0.5

Descriptions:

Termdescription typeLanguage/acceptabilityLanguage/acceptabilityCase significance
Traumatic dislocation of [body structure] (disorder)FSNus:Pgb:Pci
Traumatic dislocation of [body structure]SYNus:Pgb:Pci


Concept model:

Definition status:  


900000000000073002 |Defined (core metadata concept)|  


Applies To:

417746004 |Traumatic injury (disorder)|


Template Language (Needs updating to reflect template above}

64572001 |Disease (disorder)| : [[~1..1]] {42752001 |Due to (attribute)| = [[ +id( <<773760007 |Traumatic event (event)| ) @due]] } , [[~1..*]] {  [[~1..*]] 116676008 |Associated morphology (attribute)| = [[ +id( <<87642003 |Dislocation (morphologic abnormality)| ) @morph]],  [[~1..*]] 363698007 |Finding site (attribute)| = [[ +id( <<39352004 |Joint structure (body structure)| ) @site ]]}

Rules for description generation:

  1. Apply General rules for generating descriptions for templates;

JIRA tickets:


4 Comments

  1. It looks like this template was copied from the Traumatic dislocation template and thus the descriptions and template name need to be revised.


  2. Updated to reflect current content.  There were a number of issues with this template

  3. Jim Case Cathy Richardson Maria Braithwaite Elaine Wooler- How would you prefer to term "closed" traumatic dislocations?


    In reviewing new content additions from KP (CMT) : The FSN as requested has been created as Traumatic closed dislocation of joint of X finger. We have existing content (with KP local IDs) under 445852002 |Closed traumatic dislocation of joint (disorder)| therefore I am asking that all FSNs follow this same pattern e.g. 

             11792671000119105 |Closed traumatic dislocation of finger of left hand (disorder)|

    So the new concept FSN would be: 

    FSN: Closed traumatic dislocation of joint of left index finger (disorder). The question of PT arises as the requested PT is for Traumatic closed left index finger dislocation - Seems ok to me?

    Is this in line with what you have been advising? Any objections?

  4. I do not see why the PT should be different than the FSN in these cases.  Can certainly add the requested term as an acceptable description