SNOMED CT Templates

Page tree

StatusIn PROD
Version

1.0

Latest version2.0

Descriptions:

Termdescription typeLanguage/acceptabilityLanguage/acceptabilityCase significance
[scale type][property] of [inheres in] to [towards] in [inherent location] by
[technique] (observable entity)
FSNUS:PTGB:PTCS
[scale type][property] of [inheres in] to [towards] in [inherent location] by
[technique]
PTUS:PTGB:PTCS


Concept model:

Attribute cardinalityAttributeValueRole group cardinality
1..1


116680003 |Is a (attribute)|


363787002 |Observable entity (observable entity)|

N/A
1..1


704320005 |Towards (attribute)|


<<  17386008 |Product containing anti-infective (product)|

1..1
0..1


718497002 |Inherent location (attribute)|


1..1
1..1


370130000 |Property (attribute)|


<<  118588007 |Susceptibility (property) (qualifier value)|  

1..1
0..1


  704327008 |Direct site (attribute)|


1..1
1..1


  704319004 |Inheres in (attribute)|


< 410607006 |Organism (organism)|

1..1
1..1


  370132008 |Scale type (attribute)|


= ( 30766002 |Quantitative (qualifier value)|  OR  117363000 |Ordinal value (qualifier value)| )

1..1
0..1


  246501002 |Technique (attribute)|


 <  272394005 |Technique (qualifier value)|

1..1

Definition status:  


900000000000073002 |Defined (core metadata concept)|   

Applies To:

<< 363787002 |Observable entity (observable entity)| : 704320005 |Towards (attribute)| = <<  17386008 |Product containing anti-infective (product)|  AND  370130000 |Property (attribute)|  = <<  118588007 |Susceptibility (property) (qualifier value)|  AND  704319004 |Inheres in (attribute)|  = < 410607006 |Organism (organism)|  AND  370132008 |Scale type (attribute)|  = ( 30766002 |Quantitative (qualifier value)|  OR  117363000 |Ordinal value (qualifier value)| )

 Replaced By:

https://confluence.ihtsdotools.org/x/VzjoBg

Template language:

363787002 |Observable entity (observable entity)| : [[~1..1]] { [[~1..1]]  704320005 |Towards (attribute)|  = [[ +id (<<  17386008 |Product containing anti-infective (product)| ) @towards]] } , [[~0..1]] { [[~0..1]]  718497002 |Inherent location (attribute)|  = [[ +id (<<  123037004 |Body structure|  OR <<  410607006 |Organism|  OR <<  105590001 |Substance|  OR <<  123038009 |Specimen|  OR <<  260787004 |Physical object| ) @location]]}, [[~1..1]] { [[~1..1]]  370130000 |Property (attribute)|  = [[ +id (<<  118588007 |Susceptibility (property) (qualifier value)| ) @property]] }, [[~0..1]] { [[~0..1]]  704327008 |Direct site (attribute)|  = [[ +id (<<  123038009 |Specimen (specimen)|  ) @directsite]] }, [[~1..1]] { [[~1..1]]  704319004 |Inheres in (attribute)|  = [[ +id (< 410607006 |Organism (organism)| ) @inheresIn]] }, [[~1..1]] { [[~1..1]]  370132008 |Scale type (attribute)|  = [[ +id (=  30766002 |Quantitative (qualifier value)|  OR  117363000 |Ordinal value (qualifier value)| ) @scaleType]] }, [[~0..1]] { [[~0..1]]  246501002 |Technique (attribute)|  = [[ +id (<  272394005 |Technique (qualifier value)| ) @technique]] }

Link to the misaligned concept report:


Rules for description generation: 

  1. Apply General rules for generating descriptions for templates;
  2. Apply Enhancements for the Template Language;

JIRA ticket:

INFRA-4545 - Getting issue details... STATUS

INFRA-8736 - Getting issue details... STATUS


  • No labels

6 Comments

  1. Yongsheng Gao

    Hi Suzanne Santamaria, it looks good to me. We will need to update the role grouping policy for observables. They are self-grouped in the current implementation. 

  2. Peter G. Williams

    Could the "Applies To" be checked here?  I think "AND" has been used in error and there should be commas instead.

    I picked this up in the List All Templates report which is currently broken in Production.   I've told it to flag up any templates where the domain doesn't match any concepts.

    See  https://authoring.ihtsdotools.org/template-service/templates/Susceptibility%20Observable


    1. Suzanne Santamaria

      Yongsheng Gao , is it acceptable to change from the use of "AND" to commas in the "Applies To" section in this template?

      Thanks,

      Suzanne

      1. Yongsheng Gao

        Hi Suzanne Santamaria , the issue is not about the 'AND' in the syntax because it is the same as the comma. Please see example at 6.4 Conjunction and Disjunction

        It looks like that we do not have any concept that is modelled by Property = << Susceptibility (property).  Please run the ECL: << 363787002 |Observable entity (observable entity)| : 370130000 |Property (attribute)| = << 118588007 |Susceptibility (property) (qualifier value)|. Therefore, it is correct that this template does not match any concepts.

        Cheers,

        Yong

        cc: Peter G. Williams


        1. Peter G. Williams

          Thanks for clarifying that the use of AND is fine here Yong.    That's my TIL - today I learned - moment.     I've always used commas.

          So what's the story for this template that applies to no concepts then?

          1. Suzanne Santamaria

            Hi Peter G. Williams, we needed to create a model for the susceptibility LOINC Terms (which align with post-coordinated SNOMED CT expressions using the observable entity model in the LOINC - SNOMED CT Cooperation Project work). SNOMED does not currently contain many susceptibility test concepts, and the ones we have are in the evaluation procedure hierarchy, which as you know may be changed to the observable entity hierarchy at some point and will then use this model. 

            Thanks Yongsheng Gaofor clarifying the use of "AND."

            CC: Farzaneh Ashrafi