SNOMED CT Templates

Page tree

StatusReady for implementation
Version

2.0

Version in Production

1.0


Descriptions:

Termdescription typeLanguage/acceptabilityLanguage/acceptabilityCase Significance

[technique] quantity of intake of [substance] via [route] in [timeframe] (observable entity)

FSNUS:PTGB:PTci
[technique] quantity of intake of [substance] via [route] in [timeframe]PTUS:PTGB:PTci
[Definition]DefinitionUS:PTGB:PTCS


Concept model:

Attribute Group CardinalityAttribute Cardinality

Attribute in Group Cardinality

AttributeValue
0..01..1


116680003 |Is a (attribute)|


364393001 |Nutritional observable (observable entity)|

0..*
0..1


704321009 |Characterizes (attribute)|

[route] <<  107733003 |Introduction procedure (procedure)|

0..1
0..1


  370130000 |Property (attribute)|


<  118598001 |Property (qualifier value)|

0..1
0..1

  704323007 |Process duration (attribute)|

[timeframe] <  310886004 |Absolute times - hours (qualifier value)|

0..*
0..1

1003735000 |Process acts on (attribute)|

[substance] <<  105590001 |Substance (substance)|

0..1
0..1

  246501002 |Technique (attribute)|

[technique]

0..1
0..1

  246514001 |Units (attribute)|

Definition status:  

900000000000073002 |Sufficiently defined concept definition status (core metadata concept)|

Applies to:


<  364393001 |Nutritional observable (observable entity)|

(When checking current content for QI project, narrow query to:

Template Language:


364393001 |Nutritional observable (observable entity)| : 
[[~0..*]] { [[~0..1]]  704321009 |Characterizes (attribute)|  = [[ +id (<<  107733003 |Introduction procedure (procedure)| ) @route ]] }, 
[[~0..1]] { [[~0..1]]  370130000 |Property (attribute)|  = [[ +id (<  118598001 |Property (qualifier value)| ) ]]}, 
[[~0..1]] { [[~0..1]]  704323007 |Process duration (attribute)|  = [[ +id (<  310886004 |Absolute times - hours (qualifier value)|  ) @timeframe ]] }, 
[[~0..*]] { [[~0..1]]  1003735000 |Process acts on (attribute)|  = [[ +id ( <<  105590001 |Substance (substance)|  ) @substance ]] }, 
[[~0..1]] { [[~0..1]]  246501002 |Technique (attribute)|  = [[ +id ( 761996005 |Estimation technique (qualifier value)|  OR  272391002 |Measurement technique (qualifier value)| ) @technique]] }, 
[[~0..1]] { [[~0..1]]  246514001 |Units (attribute)|  = [[ +id ( 827056004 |Serving (qualifier value)|  OR  228922002 |Gram/meal (qualifier value)|  OR  258682000 |gram (qualifier value)|  OR  229793000 |Gram/week (qualifier value)| ) ]]}

Link to the misaligned concept report:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1T8AN0Z_H6b6usBbFj2Hc_86E-wPXClvtENx4sJzfCAo/edit#gid=0

Rules for description generation:

  1. Apply General rules for generating descriptions for templates;
  2. Remove "technique" from [technique] and change to past tense e.g "Estimation technique" should be "Estimated", "Measurement technique" should be "Measured"
  3. Remove "administration of substance via" from characterizes target e.g. "Administration of substance via oral route" should be "oral route"

JIRA ticket:

INFRA-10738 - Getting issue details... STATUS









6 Comments

  1. Elaine Wooler

    Hi Yongsheng Gao I've amended this template with your suggestion to relax the property value so we are down to only 10 misaligned due to the units value not being 827056004 |Serving (qualifier value)|.

    Could you review please.

    1. Yongsheng Gao

      Hi Elaine Wooler , As noted, the domain is Nutritional observable. There are about 30 concepts that are not aligned with the template (including 10 failed by unit). I wonder why the template has excluded the other technique and other units of measure. 

      I have reverted the other template to version 1.0 as it is in production. This version has been changed to version 2.0.


  2. Elaine Wooler

    Yongsheng Gao for the misaligned the query is narrowed to <<  226320007 |Nutrient intake (observable entity)|  or <<  39025000 |Nutrient requirement (observable entity)|.  The reason is that using <<364393001 |Nutritional observable (observable entity)| brings is content not related to nutrients.

    So the remainder all all units - I can speak to Donna about adding 228922002 |Gram/meal (qualifier value)|, 258682000 |gram (qualifier value)| and 229793000 |Gram/week (qualifier value)|.  These are not in the same sub-hierarchy.

  3. Donna Pertel

    Elaine Wooler Looking forward to talking about this. If I'm following this, an important point about this it was labeled "Nutritional intake" but our terminology looks at all intake and not just nutrient intake. Those beyond nutrients include items, such as, energy, ETOH. Adding 228922002 |Gram/meal (qualifier value)|, 258682000 |gram (qualifier value)| and 229793000 |Gram/week (qualifier value)| would support a number of the concepts that are currently misaligned.

    Donna

    cc: Constantina Papoutsakis 

  4. Elaine Wooler

    Yongsheng Gao template relaxed further and only 3 misaligned.  I have spoken to Donna about possible inclusion of other sub-hierarchies and we will look at that next but that may require more editing.

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZdnNEOyYN_IE7McC8sFWF67-EYQBEBc-Otr0ivYiKHU/edit?pli=1#gid=0

    1. Yongsheng Gao

      Thanks Elaine Wooler  I have raised a JIRA ticket for technical implementation.