Page tree

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Date: 2018-09-19

1600 - 1730 UTC

0900-1030 PDT

1200-1330 EDT

1300-1430 Argentina time


Zoom Meeting Details

SNOMED Int'l Editorial Advisory group  

Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone:


Topic: SNOMED Editorial Advisory Group - April face-to-face Part 1

Time: Apr 10, 2018 9:00 AM London

https://snomed.zoom.us/j/919465676

Observers:

Apologies




Meeting Files


Meeting recording

The folder containing the meeting recordings is located here.


Objectives

  • Obtain consensus on agenda items

Discussion items

ItemDescriptionOwnerNotesDiscussionAction
1Call to order and role callJCA




2

Conflicts of interest

Notice of recording


JCAGRE - Contractor to SI, Principal in TermMed



Approval of minutes from April business meetingJCAEdited transcripts of the discussion regarding the "Naked kernel" and the next generation of SNOMED are available here.


ECE UpdateBGO





Allergy and Intolerance updateBGO



Observables project group updateDKA
  • Issues from the vital signs modelling



Strict hierarchy paperKCA

Discuss this paper in light of the new drug model. Specifically how the new model resolves many of the issues with incorrect inferences related to the IS A hierarchy in substances.

Smashing the strict hierarchy




Update from TermMed: Naked kernel constructsGRE
  • Batch editing of the disorder/findings hierarchy to transform it into a representation with a "naked kernel" clinical entities hierarchy (no soft defaults)
  • Additional auxiliary hierarchies supporting better modeling patterns
  • An observation/statement/assertion/phenomena hierarchy that would explicitly represent context (e.g. presence/absence) while supporting correct aggregation of some absence patterns. 



Historical association refsetJRO

Revisit the intended meaning and operational consequences of the nine subflavours of 900000000000522004|Historical association reference set (foundation metadata concept)|

  • ‘historical associations’ are to be declared between inactive concepts and their candidate active (and so taxonomically reportable) substitute(s).
  • Sections within the RefSets Practical and Terminology Services guide mention that such associations exist - though they’re rather silent on what you can or should do with them.
  • No obviously visible guidance (e.g. in the new Editorial Guide) on how and why authors should decide what makes a ‘good association’
  • Not a lot of understanding of the possible consequences of a bad or missing one.



Sources of truthBGO



Agenda planning for VancouverJCA, EAG



Future meetingsJCA
















  • No labels