SNOMED CT Templates

Page tree

StatusIn PROD
Version

1.0

Descriptions:

Termdescription typeLanguage/acceptabilityLanguage/acceptabilityCase significance
History of [finding/disorder] (situation)FSNus:Pgb:Pci
History of [finding/disorder]SYNus:Pgb:Pci


Concept model:

AttributeValuerole group number


116680003 |Is a (attribute)|


243796009 |Situation with explicit context (situation)|

0


246090004 |Associated finding (attribute)|

[finding/disorder]


< 404684003 |Clinical finding (finding)|

 


The following are out of scope for this template:

Event, Observable entity, Link assertion value

1


408731000 |Temporal context (attribute)|


410513005 |In the past (qualifier value)|

 



1


408729009 |Finding context (attribute)|


410515003 |Known present (qualifier value)|

1


408732007 |Subject relationship context (attribute)|


410604004 |Subject of record (person)|

1

Definition status:  


900000000000073002 |Defined (core metadata concept)|


Applies to:

<  417662000 |History of clinical finding in subject (situation)|

Rules for description generation:

  1. Remove the semantic tag, e.g. (finding/disorder)
  2. Remove "Finding of" if the FSN begins with this text

5 Comments

  1. Jim Case

    Yong,

    Realize that this is a work in progress, but I do not understand what the goal is.  The attributes listed are a combination of those allowed for situation and procedure, yet the title of the page is "History of finding/disorder".  The rules for description generation also relate to procedure and not situations.  If I am missing something, please educate me.

  2. Penni Hernandez

    Jim
    Penni's not done editing this page, I copied another page for the format. Perhaps I should not have saved it, I thought the "in progress" would flag it. But please take a look next week when I'm done. Thx, Penni

  3. Jim Case

    OK, I just got a notice and it looked strange

  4. Penni Hernandez

    I'm not sure how to make this terming generation correct, and whether this template should be for all findings/disorders or just with disorders.  

    • Since the target for "associated finding" includes observables, events, link assertion, etc. some of the terming will be strange, e.g. History of [finding of] X (situation), or e.g History of sudden death, History of death, 
    • Should be for all findings/disorders or constrained to be "disorder", "subject of record" and "done"?

    I think I jumped into the deep end.

  5. Jim Case

    Done is not a valid value for finding context.  This would be things like "present", "Absent", "Unknown". I am not clear from your question what the specific difficulties are, but then I am not working on templates.