...
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
|
Dual author mode allows two authors to independently map the same source codes. Conflicts arising from differing interpretations are identified and resolved through a reconciliation process. This workflow brings the advantage of diverse perspectives, allowing for a comprehensive assessment of mappings. It ensures a cross-validation process where conflicting interpretations can be discussed, resolved, and reconciled, leading to accurate and reliable mappings between different coding systems or terminologies.
A variety of workflows are currently supported, including:
Workflow | Description | Process flow | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Two authors + single reconciler and single reviewer | Two users user completes all author tasks for the map. A reconciler completes the reconciliation of conflicting maps. An assigned reviewer completes the review of all map rows. |
| ||||||||||
Two authors + single reconciler and multiple reviewers | Two users user completes all author tasks for the map. A reconciler completes the reconciliation of conflicting maps. One or more users are assigned as reviewers for a specific set of source codes. Each map row is assigned to a single reviewer. |
| ||||||||||
Dual author mode with multiple authors + multiple reconcilers and multiple reviewers | Two or more users complete the author tasks that have been assigned to them. The work is divided so that two users are mapping each source code. One or more users are assigned as a reconciler. Each map row is assigned to one reconciler. One or more users are assigned as reviewers for a specific set of source codes. Each map row is assigned to a single reviewer. |
| ||||||||||
Two authors + reconciler and no review | Two users user completes complete all author tasks for the map. A reconciler completes the reconciliation of conflicting maps. No review process is required. |
|