Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Current Version - Under Revision

A substantial body of clinical information resides in electronic systems, represented using existing coding schemes, terminologies and classifications. This information may be of value to individual patient records or to population aggregations. Similarly, there are many queries and decision support protocols that contain knowledge representation based on existing terminologies.The volume and heterogeneous nature the existing data means different approaches may be required to meet specific sets of requirements.

Factors that need to be considered include:

  • The volume and value of existing in the context of the anticipated uses of a future

    SNOMED CT application

    :
    • The scale of the task and the potential value of migrated data are interrelated. Relatively small amounts of data that are of debatable value to a future system may not justify an elaborate migration process. On the other hand, it is vital to ensure that valuable existing data remains fully accessible within a

      SNOMED CT enabled application

      .

Example: In the UK alone, there are over 50 million patients primary care electronic records coded using one of the versions of the Read Codes . Based on typical patterns of use this means there are several billion coded record entries that may need to be taken into account in the migration process. A substantial proportion of this data has continuing clinical value and thus despite the scale of the task it is important to ensure that data is migrated accurately and efficiently.

  • Data quality and consistency:
    • Different users in different settings may select codes and terms in idiosyncratic ways to reflect their needs. This may be acceptable locally but it creates an obstacle to migration if the goal is consistent and comparable information at a regional, national or global level.
  • Different source code systems:
    • Several different coding scheme versions are in use and each of these poses specific challenges and offers a different profile of potential benefits.
  • Different information systems:
    • There are many system suppliers. As a result of system development and commercial mergers and takeovers, many suppliers support more than one application in the same domain. The challenge is to migrate from this diverse situation to a next generation environment supporting standards such as

      SNOMED CT

      .
  • Different information models:
    • In addition to differences in the use of codes, existing systems inevitably have a variety of approaches to structuring clinical information. As a result, the process of migrating data between systems is not simply a question of converting codes. The underlying architecture of the source data also needs to be taken into account to make optimal use of existing data without losing processable information or introducing errors.

Feedback