Summary
The Education and Product Support Team are developing a new content course: Terminology Authoring Course Level 1. This course which will supersede the Content Development Theory Course has an increased focus on extensions as well as a hands on authoring component.
The first module in the new course includes two presentations looking at requests for content from a submission and management perspective. Given the role of NRC's in submission and management of requests and the CMAG skill set, members are being asked to participate in a content review of these presentations. Guidelines will be provided. Access is restricted so reviewers will be contacted via email.
ELAG members were advised of this request.
The presentation for review via this topic page will be Managing a Request Submission.
| Date | Requested action | Requester(s) | Response required by: | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 June 2018 | Review of the Managing a Request Submission presentation |
| Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments. |
Relevant documents
Links to relevant meeting minutes, discussions and confluence sites e.g. discussions by other groups, project pages etc
Table to be completed by each CMAG member for their country. Please note as per the TOR responsibilities consideration needs to be given to Member countries who are not represented on this group to ensure that their priorities are reflected in the group discussions. Where a second round of review occurs, this table may be duplicated.
| Country | Date | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2018-06-18 | I have gone through the first 15 slides and attach my comments here. Comments DK_Managing a Request Submission.docx. My comments are mostly about the language and correctness when describing the processes. For instance when you search for a specific word it is in the concept descriptions not in the concept. I am pretty sure my comments to the rest of the document would be of the same type. |
| Canada | 2018-07-03 | Please find my comments in the attached doc. |
| New Zealand | 2018-07-04 | Excellent work! Comments attached |
| UK | 2018-07-05 | Thank you - this is great. I've attached my comments: Request management module review - UK.docx |
| Member countries without a CMAG rep |
The CMAG response(s) which are to be fed back to the relevant group or person e.g. Editorial Advisory Group.
| Date | CMAG Response | Next steps |
|---|---|---|
The action taken by the IHTSDO, Advisory Group or other as relevant. This may be a written summary or link to the relevant Confluence page.