View Source

Summary

Request for input:

Feedback on the Content Development Roadmap
- Depth of information required
Value of the Daily build information for Members
What do Member Countries see as substantive changes that they would like notification on in advance?

Date	Requested action	Requester(s)	Response required by:	Comments

Links

Content Development Roadmap: Content Development Roadmap

Daily build: https://dailybuild.ihtsdotools.org/qa/

EAG discussion on substance changes: 2017-04-25 Editorial Advisory Group Face to Face Meeting

CMAG meeting: 2017-04-26 - CMAG Meeting - Face to face in London, England

Relevant documents

Actions:

Date	Requested action	Requester(s)	Response required by:	Comments
26 April 2017	Content Development Roadmap (Link above Does the Roadmap provide a sufficient level of information in regards to planned areas of work? What additional information is required to provide Members with a sufficient level of detail? Daily build information e.g. statistics, patterns Please review the information here and comment on the value of this to assist you with understanding the changes that are coming. What does this group see as the types of substantive changes that would be of value to hear about in advance?		Camilla Wiberg Danielsen Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas 02 Jun 2017 Daniel Karlsson Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas 02 Jun 2017 Elaine Wooler Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas 02 Jun 2017 Elze de Groot Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas 02 Jun 2017 John Fountain Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas 02 Jun 2017 Linda Parisien Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas 02 Jun 2017 Matt Cordell Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas 02 Jun 2017 Olivier Bodenreider Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas 02 Jun 2017 Jostein Ven Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas 02 Jun 2017	Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments.

Country response

Table to be completed by each CMAG member for their country. Please note as per the TOR responsibilities consideration needs to be given to Member countries who are not represented on this group to ensure that their priorities are reflected in the group discussions. Where a second round of review occurs, this table may be duplicated.

Country	Date	Response
Canada	20170531	Please find my comments in the attached file
UK	07/06/2017	Apologies for not providing more detailed feedback. I presented this to our Implementation Forum on the 1st June and have asked for feedback. I agree with Linda's comments in section C of the type of changes we would like to see. For us this would also include changes to file structures or anything that might impact supplier load routines. High usage content areas are very important - it might be useful if we highlight some areas to you though some will be obvious I would think. The daily build is a very useful tool in particular the statistics and being able to drill down to see the detail behind the numbers. Overall this is a great advance in what used to be there and makes finding information a lot easier.







Member countries without a CMAG rep

CMAG response

The CMAG response(s) which are to be fed back to the relevant group or person e.g. Editorial Advisory Group.

Date	CMAG Response	Next steps

Final outcome:

Date:

The action taken by the IHTSDO, Advisory Group or other as relevant. This may be a written summary or link to the relevant Confluence page.