The Guiding Principles provide a framework within which the Advisory Group recruitment process can operate. It is understood that circumstances may arise which require the organization to determine the appropriate course of action, dependent on the situation.
Some Advisory Groups utilize a "Expert" (previously called "Standard") nomination process, which is an open to all. Appointment decisions are made by a Nominating Committee using a skills matrix and a desire to create a forum with a diversity of perspectives.
Other Advisory Groups utilize a system of "Member-based" nominations. The approved Terms of Reference describe these specifications. Member-based nominations are used when SNOMED International (SI) seeks to create a forum so that IHTSDO staff can work closely with SI Members.
In April 2015, the General Assembly decided that travel expenses to attend SI-approved meetings or other events should be handled differently for these two groups. SI should offer Advisory Group members coming from the standard nomination process travel expense reimbursement, with funds coming from the appropriate line of business or project budget. Advisory Group members coming from the Member-based nomination process should seek travel funds from the sponsoring Member.
Expert nomination process is used by:
Member-based nomination process is used by:
The Nominating Committee consists of AG Chair(s) and AG Chair recommendations are presented to the CEO for final approval.
The Nominating Committee is responsible for:
The nomination and selection period for all the Advisory Groups is between the April and October business meetings unless there is a reason, approved by the Nominating Committee, to do otherwise.
The responsible Management Team member assesses the needs and requirements of the Advisory Group.
For "Expert" positions, the AG Chair revises the skills matrix, which must align with the Advisory Group Terms of Reference. The AG Chair then assesses the current composition of the group (if any) to assess the experience of each current Advisory Group member against the matrix. Any gaps in skills and/or experience that emerge form the basis for the selection criteria for new members during the next nomination period (see #5 below). AG Chairs review members performance annually.
For "Member-based" positions, the AG Chair develops or revises a position profile, describing the skills required for the AG.
For "Expert" positions, the AG Chair reviews the skills matrix, incorporating the selection criteria identified during the needs assessment and highlighting the specific skills that complement the attributes of the incumbent membership.
For "Expert" positions, SI uses an open nomination process to identify qualified candidates who fit the position profile and have an interest in serving on the Advisory Group. Applications are accepted and collated by the Corporate Services Team.
For "Member-based" positions, Members (usually the Member Forum representatives) are contacted with the position profile and asked to submit basic information on the candidates, such as name, title, contact information, and description of why the person is appropriate for the position.
AG Chairs review the Nomination Forms (see Appendix B) received from potential candidates, the Skills Matrix, and considerations of multiculturalism and broad market-based regional understanding (e.g. not selecting only people from one or two countries).
The Corporate Services Team forwards the AG Chairs' recommendations to the CEO for approval and with approval, AG Chairs inform the candidates as to whether or not they have been selected, and follows up with important information about the Advisory Group.