View Source

Concept inactivation values

A value from the choices below must be chosen as a reason for inactivating a concept. Inactivation replacement associations are ultimately at the author's discretion. Especially in the instance of an infinite number of possible replacements, clinical relevance and subset inclusion should be considered. Non-synonymous synonyms should also be inactivated and reassigned.

Inactivation reason	Association type	Cardinality	Notes
Ambiguous	Possibly equivalent to	1..*	The inactivated concept is inherently ambiguous. Use with disjunction (and/or). Every effort should be made to identify all of the clinically useful "POSSIBLY_EQUIVALENT_TO" target concepts, which should be semantically as close as possible to the meaning of the inactivated concept. Where appropriate, new concepts should be created if they are clinically valid. POSSIBLY_EQUIVALENT_TO target may be singular where the second target is a concept that is of little or no clinical usefulness. It is not necessary to represent all of the semantic meaning of the inactivated concept if the concepts needed should not exist in SNOMED CT. If the FSN is vague, not ambiguous, consider using Meaning of component unknown.
Classification-derived component	Replaced by	0..1	Applies to concepts with classification type descriptions and conjunction - do not have to appear in a classification. Examples are "not otherwise specified", "NOS", "not elsewhere classified", "NEC", "unspecified", "other", "with", "and". Partially equivalent to: use where there is a conjunction, ("with", "and") and must include all of the elements of the conjunction, e.g. has two or more concepts as target values.
Classification-derived component	Partially equivalent to	0..*
Duplicate component	Same as	1..1	The concept has been made inactive because it has the same meaning as another concept.
Erroneous component	Replaced by	1..1	Applies to FSNs which contain an error, that when corrected, potentially changes the semantic meaning of the concept. Where the error is grammatical or a spelling mistake, which when corrected does not change the meaning, the description rather than the concept should be inactivated.
Meaning of component unknown	No association type applied	0..0	Meaning of the concept cannot be determined. The FSN is vague, not ambiguous.
Non-conformance to editorial policy	No suitable replacement identified	0..0	A suitable replacement cannot be identified or concept is no longer in scope, e.g. administrative, occupation or country concepts are under discussion. When jurisdictional control of a concept passes between extensions, eg. international core and the veterinary extension, or relates to specific forms, legal entities, etc.; no replacement is required. Applies to a concept which does not adhere to editorial guidelines eg. grouper that cannot be defined. Applies to concept that does not adhere to Precoordination Naming Patterns Replaced by: Where conformance to editorial policy potentially changes the meaning of a concept and it is possible to replace this with a concept that is semantically very close to the inactivated concept. Alternative: Editorial policy results in a change in scope e.g. branded products were considered out of scope for SNOMED CT, an Alternative would be the generic product.
	Replaced by	0..1
	Alternative	0..*
Outdated component	No suitable replacement identified	0..0	The inactivated concept is an outdated concept that is no longer considered to be clinically acceptable or semantically interoperable internationally. In some circumstances, an outdated concept simply falls into disuse without any appropriate replacement. Possibly replaced by is used when two or more potential replacements exist; two or more concepts as targets can be selected. Replaced by is used when a concept exists that is semantically similar to, or more general than, the inactivated concept for the purposes of reconciling historical data analysis.
	Possibly replaced by	0..*
	Replaced by	0..1

When changes are made to a historical relationship for a concept that was previously inactivated, such as Limited/WAS_A, assign a new historical relationship that facilitates traceability of the concept (duplicate, ambiguous, classification derived, etc.). The Limited component inactivation reason (WAS_A association type) is no longer in use for new content inactivations as of the July 2018 release.

Ambiguous

All possible meanings should be represented in the replacement targets when feasible, creating new concepts as replacements when appropriate.

Ambiguous concepts with a single replacement target may be used if one of the two possible meanings of the ambiguous concept is not clinically useful.

Classification-derived

Note: Many, but not all, concepts precoordinated with "with" and "and" are derived from classifications; regardless, this is the acceptable inactivation reason.

For concepts with exclusions, such as NEC, NOS, etc., use the Replaced by association with the immediate parent concept as the value, which is the clinical condition without any context. If a parent concept without the exclusion does not exist, it should be created as a new concept.

For concepts with conjunctions such as 'and' and 'with', use the Partially equivalent to association with the two separate values as targets. For the purposes of patient care, it is recommended that each disorder is recorded individually.

The Partially equivalent to association signifies that all applied targets must be implemented within the clinical notes to ensure the original clinical idea is represented.

Duplicate

Inactivation

Note that the meaning of the concept is based on the FSN but does not imply that the FSNs are identical.
Keep the concept with the more specific FSN. FSN is the source of a concept's meaning; hence, there should be more weight in the meaning of the FSN rather than the underlying modeling. Implementers do not see modeling.
If appropriate, add the descriptions from the inactivated concept to the remaining active concept while ensuring they are semantically equivalent, clinically useful, and follow current naming conventions.

Consider

Inactivating the newer concept
Inactivating the concept with fewer subtypes. This will simplify the process and minimize the amount of rework required.
Inactivating the concept with least modeling
Updating the retained concept's FSN and modeling to align with current policy.

Differing hierarchies

The Duplicate component is the inactivation for duplicated concepts:

Within the following hierarchies:
1. Clinical finding and Disorder
2. Procedure and Regime/Therapy
Between the following top-level hierarchies:
1. Clinical finding and Situation
2. Procedure and Situation
3. Observable and Procedure

Any possible duplicates between concepts among other paired hierarchies not listed above should be reconsidered as duplicates and directed to another inactivation reason.

If the change is a request, inform the requestor as to which concept is inactivated.

Erroneous

Where the error gives rise to potential ambiguity, use the inactivation reason of Ambiguous component. Otherwise, the Erroneous component requires a single Replaced by value.

Meaning unknown

Meaning of the concept is unknown, and an association type is not given. It will normally be necessary to search the clinical literature to establish that this is truly an unknown concept rather than an outdated clinical concept.
This inactivation reason may be used where the meaning of the FSN is considered to be vague.

Nonconformance to editorial policy

Concept which do not adhere to editorial guidance can be inactivated without an association type. Else Replaced by and Alternative are Association type options.

Policies will often delineate how these two Association type options will be used. Changes of this type often include bulk updates and may relate to medicinal products, substances, and devices.

Outdated

When an outdated concept simply falls into disuse without any appropriate replacement, no historical association is applied.

Replaced by is used for a single replacement concept that is semantically similar to or more general than the inactivated concept.

Possibly replaced by is used for multiple replacement concepts.

For example,

A substance or organism originally believed to be a single entity has been reclassified as two or more substances or organisms.

For more information, see the SNOMED CT Editorial Advisory Group, Management of Concept Inactivation Confluence page for details on continuing work in this area.