Summary

The Allergies/Hypersensitivity and Intolerance Clinical Reference Group is seeking information on which countries are using the allergy to substance concepts e.g. 417532002 |Allergy to fish (finding)| rather than just documenting allergies using substance and product concepts. 

Action item

DateRequested actionRequester(s)Response required by:Comments
6 December 2019Advice on allergy concepts used in your country
  • Camilla Wiberg Danielsen  Please advise if your country is using the allergy to substance concepts rather than just documenting allergies using substance and product concepts.
  • Daniel Karlsson  Please advise if your country is using the allergy to substance concepts rather than just documenting allergies using substance and product concepts.
  • Sheree Hemingway  Please advise if your country is using the allergy to substance concepts rather than just documenting allergies using substance and product concepts.
  • Elze de Groot  Please advise if your country is using the allergy to substance concepts rather than just documenting allergies using substance and product concepts.
  • Linda Parisien  Please advise if your country is using the allergy to substance concepts rather than just documenting allergies using substance and product concepts.
  • Matt Cordell  Please advise if your country is using the allergy to substance concepts rather than just documenting allergies using substance and product concepts.
  • Olivier Bodenreider  Please advise if your country is using the allergy to substance concepts rather than just documenting allergies using substance and product concepts.
  • Jostein Ven  Please advise if your country is using the allergy to substance concepts rather than just documenting allergies using substance and product concepts.
  • Theresa Barry  Please advise if your country is using the allergy to substance concepts rather than just documenting allergies using substance and product concepts.
Please post your responses in the Country response table below.




Relevant documents


Links

Links to relevant meeting minutes, discussions and confluence sites e.g. discussions by other groups, project pages etc

Country response 

Table to be completed by each CMAG member for their country. Please note as per the TOR responsibilities consideration needs to be given to Member countries who are not represented on this group to ensure that their priorities are reflected in the group discussions. Where a second round of review occurs, this table may be duplicated.

CountryDateResponse
 Norway06.12.2019 In our national summary record, we are using concepts like fish, milk, egg etc to document past reactions to etc, i.e. the allergen as a separate information element. Our plan is to map this to SNOMED CT (partially done already) or use SNOMED CT as the base terminology. In that context, we won't use the precoordinated concepts. The national work on archetypes do not use the precoordinated concept. I will check whether the precoordinated concepts are used in other contexts. Update will follow.
 Denmark06.12.2019 Denmark is presently not using the allergy concepts.
   
   
   
   
   
   
Member countries without a CMAG rep  

 

CMAG response

The CMAG response(s) which are to be fed back to the relevant group or person e.g. Editorial Advisory Group.

DateCMAG ResponseNext steps
   
   
   

 

Final outcome: 

Date: 

The action taken by the IHTSDO, Advisory Group or other as relevant. This may be a written summary or link to the relevant Confluence page.