Page tree

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 16 Next »

Summary

Under care of <professional> (finding) content is being considered for inactivation (with return the relevant extension where applicable) as it is seen as realm specific content. The meaning of the term used to represent the clinician or service may vary between countries. Prior to undertaking this step the CMAG is being asked if this demotion of content would cause an issue for members.

Please see the subtypes under the following concepts:

  • Under care of team (finding)
  • Under care of person (finding)
  • Under care of service (finding)

 

Actions: 

DateRequested actionRequester(s)Response required by:Comments
 Requested 11th April 2018. Please advise if the demotion of this content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
  • Camilla Wiberg Danielsen  Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
  • Daniel Karlsson  Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
  • Elaine Wooler  Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
  • Elze de Groot   Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
  • John Fountain   Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
  • Linda Parisien  Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
  • Matt Cordell  Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
  • Olivier Bodenreider  Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
  • Jostein Ven  Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
  • Johannes Gnaegi  Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
  • Theresa Barry  Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country.
Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments.


Relevant documents

No files shared here yet.

2018-04-11 - CMAG Meeting: Face to face in London, England

Country response 

CountryDateResponse
 Sweden 2018-04-23Has nothing in the extension in this group. Also, no content in our maintained and under-development refests.
 Denmark2018-04-25Not in use in Denmark. 
 UK 2018-04-26Is there any further information on the decision around this please. I've looked at the tracker which states "Ed Panel decision: Pattern not accepted, considered to be realm specific especially with respect to social care." We have extension content in this space and there is a significant amount of core content that is not realm specific e.g. 305439002 | Under care of counselor (finding), 305485004 | Under care of geneticist (finding), 305613006 | Under care of physiotherapist (finding). Is this content also to be retired or just the realm specific?
 NZ 2018-05-01 No concerns raised in New Zealand
 AU 2018-05-03I'm not aware of any sites using this content, but they could well be? Although the specific definition of the 'profession' could vary between countries - I think the terms are still valid. Using the UK example: 305439002 | Under care of counselor (finding) - counselor mean something slightly different in AU compared to other countries (registered/training etc). But I can see it being useful, and not sure how else we or other countries would name it? What is the problem with it remaining in core? (it seems a low value change).
CA 2018-05-04 Not in use in Canada.
   
   
Member countries without a CMAG rep  

 

CMAG response

DateCMAG ResponseNext steps
   
   
   

 

Final outcome: 

Date: 

 

  • No labels