9 records added/updated :

> 113fc653-4906-0536-299b-21b4294b977c 20211031 1 450829007 900000000000490003 2213271000209113 900000000000495008
> 3c1d0611-92b5-a39a-5efb-f27ca7ca5a41 20211031 1 450829007 900000000000490003 2213231000209110 900000000000495008
> 5b0ddb35-94d6-9dc7-662a-c41ab4d2ceec 20211031 1 450829007 900000000000490003 2213261000209119 900000000000495008
> 73c8c89b-a876-2339-151d-7bde2321e6be 20211031 1 450829007 900000000000490003 1506674016 900000000000495008
> 87f7a51c-a26b-506d-4df9-68ca111956bb 20211031 1 450829007 900000000000490003 2213221000209112 900000000000495008
> 8b176527-da04-d804-d55c-321f35a1b3a0 20211031 1 450829007 900000000000490003 2213281000209111 900000000000495008
> 8b277036-6cce-f75b-4c6b-eea04c975d0a 20211031 1 450829007 900000000000490003 1012497011 900000000000495008
> fa8d2f1f-4ce2-f231-a0ac-e1e9ffbb7419 20211031 1 450829007 900000000000490003 2213241000209118 900000000000495008
> fdd686f1-8d8e-bfa2-3183-958b1e4ec5e2 20211031 1 450829007 900000000000490003 2213251000209116 900000000000495008

Guillermo confirmed this was as expected, via email on 26/10/2021 at 04:35:

9508 records inactivated +

870 records added/updated

Guillermo confirmed this was as expected, via email on 26/10/2021 at 04:35:

An RVF run on beta version identified ~5000 cases violating the following rule:

Term already exists within this hierarchy on concept <SCTID>. Two descriptions in the same hierarchy may only have the same term if they have different language codes or one description or concept is inactive.

This was related to a change in the body structure SEP triplet pattern editorial policies that removed a synonym from concepts like “entire X” that was also used as synonym for “structure of X”. This was an old issue affecting the International Edition that was resolved recently, and after the rule was added to RVF it was evident that this would have to be addressed also in the Spanish Edition at some point in time. We reviewed the cases during the beta period, and prepared a batch update that handled 90% of the cases, and manually fixed the rest of the cases. Since one of the beta evaluations from the Spain NRC was partially related to this issue, we decided to promote the fix for this release instead of addressing it in the next one.

The Spain NRC reported 44 cases of the rule “Active descriptions must not have the same term as another within the concept unless the language code is different. There is another description with the same term but different case. Please remove the other description or make it inactive.”, we didn’t act on them as in most cases there are acceptable exceptions in both English and Spanish.

" src="cid:ii_kv7j87jz0" alt="" class="Apple-web-attachment Singleton" style="opacity: 1;">

While there were no critical reports arising from the beta evaluation feedback, we think the cleanup of the RVF results would facilitate future monitoring of new cases that would otherwise be obfuscated by the big numbers reported in the rule discussed above.

9508 records inactivated +

1029 records added/updated

Guillermo confirmed this was as expected, via email on 26/10/2021 at 04:35:

An RVF run on beta version identified ~5000 cases violating the following rule:

Term already exists within this hierarchy on concept <SCTID>. Two descriptions in the same hierarchy may only have the same term if they have different language codes or one description or concept is inactive.

This was related to a change in the body structure SEP triplet pattern editorial policies that removed a synonym from concepts like “entire X” that was also used as synonym for “structure of X”. This was an old issue affecting the International Edition that was resolved recently, and after the rule was added to RVF it was evident that this would have to be addressed also in the Spanish Edition at some point in time. We reviewed the cases during the beta period, and prepared a batch update that handled 90% of the cases, and manually fixed the rest of the cases. Since one of the beta evaluations from the Spain NRC was partially related to this issue, we decided to promote the fix for this release instead of addressing it in the next one.

The Spain NRC reported 44 cases of the rule “Active descriptions must not have the same term as another within the concept unless the language code is different. There is another description with the same term but different case. Please remove the other description or make it inactive.”, we didn’t act on them as in most cases there are acceptable exceptions in both English and Spanish.

" src="cid:ii_kv7j87jz0" alt="" class="Apple-web-attachment Singleton" style="opacity: 1;">

While there were no critical reports arising from the beta evaluation feedback, we think the cleanup of the RVF results would facilitate future monitoring of new cases that would otherwise be obfuscated by the big numbers reported in the rule discussed above.