...
Each
is defined by a set of
to other
The resulting definition may be sufficient to distinguish the
from its parents and siblings in the
Gloss |
---|
Space | true |
---|
t | subtype hierarchy |
---|
|
in which case the
is considered to be
Gloss |
---|
Space | true |
---|
t | sufficiently defined. |
---|
GlosTerm | sufficiently defined concept |
---|
|
If the definition is not sufficient to distinguish the
from its parents and siblings, the
is said to be
The
contains a field that is set to indicate whether its definition status is
or
Gloss |
---|
Space | true |
---|
t | sufficiently defined. |
---|
GlosTerm | sufficiently defined concept |
---|
|
The figure below illustrates the abstract logical model of a
, includin g the defining
between
(represented by the associations labelled
sourceId , destinationId , and typeId and ) and the definition status (represented by the
definitionStatusId Specref |
---|
RefType | (field) |
---|
t | definitionStatusId |
---|
|
).
Anchor |
---|
| _7f5ad415-98fa-4c05-8698-854b2751cbf5__d |
---|
| _7f5ad415-98fa-4c05-8698-854b2751cbf5__d |
---|
|
...
A
that is part of a
relationshipGroup Specref |
---|
RefType | (field) |
---|
t | relationshipGroup |
---|
|
is only regarded as redundant if the
relationshipGroup Specref |
---|
RefType | (field) |
---|
t | relationshipGroup |
---|
|
as a whole subsumes another
relationshipGroup Specref |
---|
RefType | (field) |
---|
t | relationshipGroup |
---|
|
. This is the view expressed in the standard
distribution and this same view also forms part of the long