...
| Date | Requested action | Requester(s) | Response required by: | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Requested 11th April 2018. | Please advise if the demotion of this content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. |
| Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments. |
...
2018-04-11 - CMAG Meeting: Face to face in London, England
| Jira | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Country response
| Country | Date | Response | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2018-04-23 | Has nothing in the extension in this group. Also, no content in our maintained and under-development refests. | |||
| Denmark | 2018-04-25 | Not in use in Denmark. | |||
| UK | 2018-04-26 | Is there any further information on the decision around this please. I've looked at the tracker which states "Ed Panel decision: Pattern not accepted, considered to be realm specific especially with respect to social care." We have extension content in this space and there is a significant amount of core content that is not realm specific e.g. 305439002 | Under care of counselor (finding), 305485004 | Under care of geneticist (finding), 305613006 | Under care of physiotherapist (finding). Is this content also to be retired or just the realm specific? | |||
| NZ | 2018-05-01 | No concerns raised in New Zealand | |||
| AU | 2018-05-03 | I'm not aware of any sites using this content, but they could well be? Although the specific definition of the 'profession' could vary between countries - I think the terms are still valid. Using the UK example: 305439002 | Under care of counselor (finding) - counselor mean something slightly different in AU compared to other countries (registered/training etc). But I can see it being useful, and not sure how else we or other countries would name it? What is the problem with it remaining in core? (it seems a low value change). | |||
| CA | 2018-05-04 | Not in use in Canada. | |||
| NL | 2018-05-08 | We do have some content of this in our extension, for example Under care of heart transplantation team (finding). But these concept are more to be able to model 'guidance or support after a heart transplantation' in the finding hierarchy. So we are OK when you inactivate the content and we will find a solution for this  | |||
| UK | 14-05-2018 | Thank you for clarifying that all content in this space is proposed for inactivation. As mentioned in the CMAG meeting this could cause issues for us and I don't see the issue with it remaining in the core. I would like to take this to our UK SNOMED CT Edition committee on the 5th June for a complete response. | |||
| Member countries without a CMAG rep |
...