Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Disallow conflicting representations by disallowing use of information model elements, i.e. cardinality 0..0.

Example:

Impact: would require post-coordination or likely extensive local, national, or international pre-coordination.

Meaning is provided by a mutually constrained combination of multiple SNOMED CT encoded information model elements

Impact: all these options would require software implementing run-time constraint checking between multiple information model elements

Option 2

Allow use of information model element only if there is no "corresponding" (how?) SNOMED CT attribute in a concept definition of a concept used as a value in another information model element.

...

This pattern does e.g. not allow concepts which are primitive children of concepts with non-IsA relationships and thus seems overly restrictive.

Option X+

There are other options for guaranteeing consistency between multiple SNOMED CT-valued information model elements, and hence interoperability:

  • the value of one information model element, if it does not exist, is assigned by extracting a value from a SNOMED CT attribute from a concept which is a value of another information model element.
  • the value of one information model element, if it does not exist, is assigned or asserted to be equal to or subsumed by an expression which is a templated combination of multiple other information model elemetn values, .

Meaning is provided by a mutually unconstrained combination of multiple SNOMED CT encoded information model elements

...