...
2018-04-11 - CMAG Meeting: Face to face in London, England
| Jira | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Country response
| Country | Date | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2018-04-23 | Has nothing in the extension in this group. Also, no content in our maintained and under-development refests. |
| Denmark | 2018-04-25 | Not in use in Denmark. |
| UK | 2018-04-26 | Is there any further information on the decision around this please. I've looked at the tracker which states "Ed Panel decision: Pattern not accepted, considered to be realm specific especially with respect to social care." We have extension content in this space and there is a significant amount of core content that is not realm specific e.g. 305439002 | Under care of counselor (finding), 305485004 | Under care of geneticist (finding), 305613006 | Under care of physiotherapist (finding). Is this content also to be retired or just the realm specific? |
| NZ | 2018-05-01 | No concerns raised in New Zealand |
| AU | 2018-05-03 | I'm not aware of any sites using this content, but they could well be? Although the specific definition of the 'profession' could vary between countries - I think the terms are still valid. Using the UK example: 305439002 | Under care of counselor (finding) - counselor mean something slightly different in AU compared to other countries (registered/training etc). But I can see it being useful, and not sure how else we or other countries would name it? What is the problem with it remaining in core? (it seems a low value change). |
| CA | 2018-05-04 | Not in use in Canada. |
| Member countries without a CMAG rep |
...