Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <826985925.544.1711627493984@[3.220.22.64]> Subject: Exported From Confluence MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_Part_543_290616420.1711627493984" ------=_Part_543_290616420.1711627493984 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: file:///C:/exported.html
Four documents in the document section: Deb 22 2018 agenda Caries spread= sheet Caries review 2018 workplan These will be used for various parts of o= ur meeting-refer to the agenda.
Changes to Special Interest Groups Dear all, SNOMED International has in= the past engaged with clinical groups through the use of Special interest = Groups (SIG=E2=80=99s). Currently we have six clinical SIG=E2=80=99s and 2 = functional SIG=E2=80=99s. Whilst this has proven effective in the past, it = is also an approach that is not saleable. There are a number of issues rela= ting to why this is the case that are detailed in the presentation =E2=80= =93 The future of SIGs v1.1, available in Documents. The changes to the wa<= /p>
There is a bad inheritance for concept 17552000|Dental calculus (disorde= r)|. It is due to the "associated morphology =3D calculus (morphologic abno= rmality" being in a separate hierarchy from the parent's "associated morpho= logy =3D accretion (morphologic abnormality)". I was trying to fix this and= wondered if "calculus" is really the correct morphologic abnormality to be= using in the dental context. It seems to be a hardening of the plaque depo= sit and that maybe it would be better to add a n
Will there be a face-to-face meeting in SF in march? I remember that we = should consider how many were likely to participate before deciding. How wa= s the feedback?
I have added the email string concerning caries representation with a pr= imary focus on whether we have the terms in appropriate hierarchies. Penni = has added other comments and suggestions in the topic effective caries repr= esentation
I have made a change to a morphologic abnormality 804000009|External hyp= ertosis (morphologic abnormality), I added a new parent of "Neoplasm, benig= n (morphologic abnormality)". While looking through the impacts of this cha= nge I came across "Enamel spur" which has been modeled with "Osteophyte (mo= rphologic abnormality)" which is a subtype of "804000009|External hypertosi= s (morphologic abnormality)". My question is, what is the correct morpholog= y for "Enamel spur"? Osteophyte doesn't see
Please post your thoughts on how to properly represent dental caries in = waht would be the most effective manner that you can identify for use in el= ectronic records system. There are currently at least two international mod= els for caries. Both of these, if represented exactly as the models, might = prove less effective within SNOMED. Please post your thoughts and what you = believe to be the most important considerations here so that others can rev= iew and comment on t hem. By Tuesday, Dec
Just wanted to share this with all of you. Norway has finally decided to= join IHTSDO! The decission is announced in Norwegian on this web-page http= s://ehelse.no/nyheter/norsk-medlemskap-i-ihtsdo To me this is an important = step towards being able continue the work with SNOMED CT.
These have not been consistently used in concepts representing plural an= d singular. If we say "Appearance of gingivae (observable entity)" is it ne= cessarily plural and should it have a subtype of "Morphology of gingiva (ob= servable entity)". Would this be singular? This is my attempt at using the = Discussions to note things that need to be looked at as we add or model con= tent. We'll see how it works. :-)
New Zealand has a national electronic oral health record project that wi= ll introduce a new generation of information systems to dental services in = public hospitals. Naturally we will want to introduce SNOMED CT, but we are= looking for advice on the best content and implementation resources availa= ble.
Topic | Status | Author | Like | View | Replies | Creation date | Last Reply | Contributors | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 22 2018 meeting | In discussion | 7= 96 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime()<= /span> Feb 19, 2018 23:32<= /td> | Feb 19, 2018 23:42 | Undefined | |||||
Changes to SIGs | New | 1= 126 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime()<= /span> Mar 17, 2017 17:48<= /td> | - | - | Undefined | ||||
17552000|Dental calculus (disorder) | In discussion | 1= 317 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime()<= /span> Feb 24, 2017 22:19<= /td> | Apr 5, 2017 10:42 | Undefined | |||||
Next Face-to-face meeting | In discussion | 1= 934 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime()<= /span> Jan 12, 2017 13:23<= /td> | Feb 13, 2017 14:44 | Undefined | |||||
Caries representation email string= Dec 2016 | In discussion | 1= 341 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime()<= /span> Jan 9, 2017 23:22= td> | Jan 9, 2017 23:36 | Undefined | |||||
109459007|Enamel spur (disorder) | In discussion | 2= 955 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime()<= /span> Jan 6, 2017 20:43= td> | Apr 5, 2017 08:42 | Undefined | |||||
Effective caries respresentation | In discussion | 1= 600 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime()<= /span> Dec 17, 2016 18:09<= /td> | Jan 4, 2017 18:01 | Undefined | |||||
Norwegian IHTSDO membership | In discussion | 1= 360 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime()<= /span> Jun 12, 2016 07:43<= /td> | Jan 6, 2017 20:33 | Undefined | |||||
Gingivae vs. Gingiva | In discussion | 2= 237 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime()<= /span> Apr 18, 2016 14:34<= /td> | Apr 20, 2016 08:26 | Undefined | |||||
National electronic oral health= record project | In discussion | 2= 202 | $discPage.getCreationDate().getTime()<= /span> Mar 18, 2016 08:25<= /td> | Apr 4, 2016 22:57 | Undefined |
Mar= k Jurkovich