Page tree

Date

6 December 2016: 2000-2100UTC

Objectives

Discussion items (In draft)

 

ItemDescriptionOwnerNotesAction
1WelcomeCathy Richardson
  • Attendees list

 

2Approval of minutes 
3Apologies/conflicts of interest
  • Apologies as noted
  • Conflicts - review and update

 

 

4Action ListCathy Richardson

 

5TORCathy Richardson
  • Approval
  • Feedback from the Management Board
 
6Update from Face to Face meeting
  • Extension Management Proposal
  • SNOMED CT-LOINC
  • Policy on processing requests which tie into a content tracker issue.
  • Internal IHTSDO policies that impact countries adding content to an extension.
 
7Member Forum update  
8Inactivation of the WAS A attributeReview of the historical association WAS A 
9Laterality refsetYongsheng Gao  
10Process on submission of content for promotion
  • New Editorial Guidance coming e.g. Relationship grouping
  • Direct Mode in the CRS tool- new content and changes to content
  • Template based authoring- demonstration
 
11CMAG 2017 Work PlanALL

 

12Quality Assurance vs Content RequestsCathy Richardson
  • Input required to clarify member preference on focus.
    • Moved to January agenda given timing.
 
13Any other businessALL
  • Next meeting 10 Jan 2017 at 2000 UTC
 

Meeting Files

  File Modified
Microsoft Word Document 20161206_CMAG_draft minutes_v0.2.docx 2016-Dec-17 by Cathy Richardson

Actions: 

Date
Requested action
Requester(s)
Response required by:
Comments
 17 December 2016Review December minutes and advise if any changes are required. 
  • Daniel KarlssonReview December minutes and advise if any changes are required. 
  • Elaine Wooler  Review December minutes and advise if any changes are required. 
  • Linda Parisien  Review December minutes and advise if any changes are required. 
  • Olivier Bodenreider  Review December minutes and advise if any changes are required. 
  • John Fountain  Review December minutes and advise if any changes are required. 
  • Camilla Wiberg Danielsen  Review December minutes and advise if any changes are required. 
Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments.

Previous Meetings

TitleCreatorModified
No content found.

 

7 Comments

  1. Hi Cathy,

    I am reading through the different AG's minutes from the October meeting and I saw this topic on the TRAG page:

    New file type (RF2 Laterality Refset) to be added to the International Edition. Can we add this to our agenda? I would appreciate to get more information about it. Thanks
  2. The direct authoring feature looks very nice!

    Couple of questions related to that feature:

    1. How will the requestor be able to track the changes submitted?
    2.  How will the requestor be able to track the changes submitted vs the changes that will be done by IHTSDO's team?
    3. I see this new feature as a duplicated steps in the RFC process. Will there be some facilitation to author in our own authoring environment and submit from our tool to CRS the RFC, so we do not duplicate efforts? 
    4. Will we be able to get the concepid sooner than when it is published in the Jan/July version?
    5. The feature is currently meant for individual requests. We never submit individual requests. Would it be feasible to create excel authoring template per types of requests (as shown in the recording) that we could submit. These would then be uploaded in CRS and would populate the direct authoring fields...??
  3. Linda Parisien Hi there, I'd just like to confirm that you are asking about the direct mode in the Request Submission tool as opposed to the the template based authoring that Yong presented. Regards, Cathy.

    1. I'm referring to what was presented as part of the recording.

  4. Hi Linda, I've been in to touch with our IT area on a couple of your questions and it would be best if you forward these questions to info@ihtsdo.org and they will respond directly to you. Kind regards, Cathy 

  5. Hi Cathy, I've looked at the minutes and haven't noticed any changes to be made.